(Source: zacharycymry)
TEST YOUR KEYBOARD
Hold both shift keys down, and try to type “THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG.”
THKBNFJS THLAY DG.holy shit
HE QUIK BBROWN FO JUPS OER HE LA DOG
close enough
THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG
I don’t get it.
HE QUIC BROWN OX UMP OVER HE Z OG
That phrase has every letter in the alphabet in it so it can test every letter key. On most keyboards, the circuitry won’t register you pressing a few different keys at the same time.
hiiii everanix hiiii
hiiii nix
hiiii
This was the first google image result for “everanix”:
I am not surprised.
Fizgig!
Edit:
She took a backseat while in the manga, she was always at the forefront.
YES.
I read Sailor V and honestly, she was as bad as Usagi/Serena as leader. If we had her as a leader while she was in Sailor Moon, I’d expect a story not much different. I would have loved her as leader if she acted like she did in Sailor Moon.
In that case, I would expect a dynamic like Bloom/Stella in Winx Club. Stella is the impossible one while Bloom has her head and she’s the leader instead.
I think it would have been better to have Sailor Venus as the leader because then it would have been at least a little shocking when the moon princess they are seeking turned out to have been Usagi all along.
(Source: sailormoonconfessions)
“So Tenzin, would you say that you and Chief Bei-Fong had a…
ROCKY RELATIONSHIP?”
“Well it definitely wasn’t a….
BREEZE”
“Y’know, I’m surprised Tenzin couldn’t handle me. They say I’ve got…
NERVES OF STEEL.”
“Well, I’d say you two have practically hit..
ROCK BOTTOM.”
“My daughter and Tenzin, together? I sure didn’t…
SEE THAT ONE COMING.”
Lost it at the upside down glasses.
(via Condescending Wonka)
I can’t for the life of me understand why any minority, knowing how often minorities are discriminated against, would oppose same-sex marriage.
I can’t for the life of me figure out how people keep pretending there are no Black LGBT folks while rushing to blame black people for legislation that they didn’t fund, write, or even all vote for in the first place. Not to mention if we’re going to talk about discrimination? Let’s talk about racism in LGBT commmunities. Ooh wait, no one wants to do that hunh?
People wanna talk all day about how blackfolks hate the LGBT community, but how many people are talking about Dan Savage’s racism, sexism, transphobia, and general asshole behavior?
**crickets**
Yeah I thought so.
They’re too busy parroting his bigotry to do any math, or listen to black LGBT folks. After all, why address all the white bigots (who hold the majority of the votes & fund legislation like Prop 8 & Amendment One) when you can target a smaller population, ignore intersectionality, and pretend to be the great savior?
It would be real funny if in some magical alternate universe, where black people actually ARE a monolith, and we all actually do ALL vote in favor of marriage equality, to see the faces of these idiots when that shit STILL DOESN’T GET PASSED, because they didn’t put the effort into changing the minds of these white people they think are so goddamn open minded.
Because black folks are only 14% of the US population, but we hold ALL OF THE VOTES when it comes to marriage equality and LGBT rights, right?!
Doesn’t the same message of “it only applies to those who do oppose gay marriage” which you applied to “die cis scum” and “evangelical vegans” apply here?
No… why on earth would it?
Did I miss a well-funded, well-connected group of meat eaters who are going around orchestrating a campaign to bother me about the ethics of my dinner plate while I’m turning around and blaming vegans on for fomenting a culture of mealtime evangelism?
“It’s talking about more specific people than just [vegans/cis people]” isn’t some arbitrary standard that is arbitrarily apply in those cases.
It’s an explanation of how language works that really should not be necessary.
“Evangelical vegans” is clearly not talking about vegans in general; if my point were that vegans are evangelical in general, I would say that and then the phrase “evangelical vegans” would thereafter be redundant. Therefore, the phrase “evangelical vegans” itself makes it clear that I’m not talking about something about vegans in general.
The issue being discussed here doesn’t really parallel that as neatly as you seem to think it does, though. If the issue were that someone was saying “Homophobic Black voters are responsible for the passage of anti-gay measures!” and the arguments above were saying “But some Black people voted against them!”, you would have something resembling a point with your oh-so-innocuous, not-at-all-loaded question (by the way, you are two away from your lifetime limit on those. Three from now, I’m going to block you. Make your last two ones last!)
But that’s not what’s being said. That’s not the issue under discussion here. The crucial point is that Black voters are not a large enough bloc for the subset of Black voters who are socially conservative/homophobic to be a significant factor compared to white social conservatives/homophobes, so if somebody singles out Black homophobic voters it’s clearly not because they’re homophobes.
Seriously, though. Two more loaded questions. That’s your lifetime limit.
Actually I think this one was just a reading comprehension failure on my part, sorry. You are right about what I thought the argument was, and rereading it I am not sure how I got there. It’s obviously true that you should not blame the failure of gay rights on black people. I will read things I reply to at least twice from now on.
Were there other loaded questions I have asked you?
